click
back
to FedCirBlog

Fed. Cir.'s Patent Rulings
for week ending 2013-02-08 (in reverse order)

(Fed. Cir.'s Weekly Disposition Sheet for week ending 2013-02-08, if available)

Clear with Computers LLC v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc. (February 8, 2013 – Nonprecedential)
Appeal from E.D.Tx. 09-cv-0479 (Davis, C.J.)
—» AFFIRMED per Fed. Cir. R. 36 (no comments)

Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp. (February 8, 2013 – Nonprecedential)
Appeal from D.Col. 09-cv-1257 (Brimmer, J.)
—» AFFIRMED per Fed. Cir. R. 36 (no comments)

Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Mylan Pharm. (February 7, 2013 – Nonprecedential)
Appeal from D.N.J. 10-cv-3085 (Linares, J.)
—» AFFIRMED per Fed. Cir. R. 36 (no comments)

R+L Carriers v. Pitt Ohio Express (February 6, 2013 – Nonprecedential)
Appeal from S.D.Ohio 10-cv-0090 (Beckwith, J.)
—» AFFIRMED per Fed. Cir. R. 36 (no comments)

Webstone Co. v. Red-White Valve USA (February 6, 2013 – Nonprecedential)
Appeal from D.Mass. 11-cv-40145 (Saylor, IV, J.)
—» DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction

Arkema, Inc. v. Honeywell Int'l Inc. (February 5, 2013 – PRECEDENTIAL)
Appeal from E.D.Pa. 10-cv-2886 (Yohn, Jr., J.)
—» REVERSED (DJ jurisdiction exists; Arkema need only show its future sales will result in what Honeywell views as infringement), REMANDED

Accent Pkg. v. Leggett & Platt (February 4, 2013 – PRECEDENTIAL)
Appeal from S.D.Tx. 10-cv-1362 (Hughes, J.)
—» REVERSED-in-part (clm. constr. in error; non-infrgmnt rev'd), AFFIRMED-in-part (some non-infrgmnt stands), REMANDED

Links and more details (if any) concerning these rulings below

Clear with Computers LLC v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1291 – Citation: n/a
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: February 8, 2013 | Status: Nonprecedential
Type: Appeal from E.D.Tx. 09-cv-0479 (Davis, C.J.)
Summary: AFFIRMED per Fed. Cir. R. 36 (no comments)
Judge(s): PER CURIAM (Moore, Clevenger, O'Malley)
Lower decision citation: n/a | n/a (0000-00-00)



Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1387 – Citation: n/a
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: February 8, 2013 | Status: Nonprecedential
Type: Appeal from D.Col. 09-cv-1257 (Brimmer, J.)
Summary: AFFIRMED per Fed. Cir. R. 36 (no comments)
Judge(s): PER CURIAM (Lourie, Dyk, Reyna)
Lower decision citation: n/a | n/a (0000-00-00)



Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Mylan Pharm.
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1434 – Citation: n/a
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: February 7, 2013 | Status: Nonprecedential
Type: Appeal from D.N.J. 10-cv-3085 (Linares, J.)
Summary: AFFIRMED per Fed. Cir. R. 36 (no comments)
Judge(s): PER CURIAM (Dyk, Mayer, Reyna)
Lower decision citation: n/a | n/a (0000-00-00)



R+L Carriers v. Pitt Ohio Express
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1471 – Citation: n/a
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: February 6, 2013 | Status: Nonprecedential
Type: Appeal from S.D.Ohio 10-cv-0090 (Beckwith, J.)
Summary: AFFIRMED per Fed. Cir. R. 36 (no comments)
Judge(s): PER CURIAM (Newman, Prost, O'Malley)
Lower decision citation: n/a | n/a (0000-00-00)



Webstone Co. v. Red-White Valve USA
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1256 – Citation: n/a
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: February 6, 2013 | Status: Nonprecedential
Type: Appeal from D.Mass. 11-cv-40145 (Saylor, IV, J.)
Summary: DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction
Judge(s): PER CURIAM (Dyk, Prost, O'Malley)
Lower decision citation: n/a | n/a (0000-00-00)



Arkema, Inc. v. Honeywell Int'l Inc.
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1308 – Citation: ___ F.3d ___
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: February 5, 2013 | Status: PRECEDENTIAL
Type: Appeal from E.D.Pa. 10-cv-2886 (Yohn, Jr., J.)
Summary: REVERSED (DJ jurisdiction exists; Arkema need only show its future sales will result in what Honeywell views as infringement), REMANDED
Judge(s): DYK (author), PLAGER, O'MALLEY
Lower decision citation: Arkema, Inc. v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc. | 2012 WL 360189 (2012-02-03)



Accent Pkg. v. Leggett & Platt
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1011 – Citation: ___ F.3d ___
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: February 4, 2013 | Status: PRECEDENTIAL
Type: Appeal from S.D.Tx. 10-cv-1362 (Hughes, J.)
Summary: REVERSED-in-part (clm. constr. in error; non-infrgmnt rev'd), AFFIRMED-in-part (some non-infrgmnt stands), REMANDED
Judge(s): PROST (author), RADER, REYNA
Lower decision citation: Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc. | n/a (2011-06-30)