click
back
to FedCirBlog

Fed. Cir.'s Patent Rulings
for week ending 2013-05-03 (in reverse order)

(Fed. Cir.'s Weekly Disposition Sheet for week ending 2013-05-03, if available)

Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. (May 1, 2013 – PRECEDENTIAL)
Appeal from E.D.Tx. 07-cv-0153 (Everingham, M.J.)
—» AFFIRMED-in-part (jury's infringement verdict & dmgs award), VACATED-in-part (perm. inj. as overbroad), REMANDED-in-part

Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. (May 1, 2013 – PRECEDENTIAL)
Appeals from E.D.Tx. 09-cv-0097 (Ward, J.)
—» AFFIRMED-in-part (clm. constr. right; defs. failed to prove '149 pat. clm. 4 is obvious), REVERSED-in-part (E.D.Tx. erred in finding '463 clms. not invalid as obvious)

Shimano, Inc. v. Rea (April 29, 2013 – Nonprecedential)
Appeal from PTO BPAI Inter Partes Reexam 95/001,051
—» AFFIRMED (antecedent basis clm. constr.; dep. clm. broadened in re-exam invalid for lack of written description)

Links and more details (if any) concerning these rulings below

Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1029 – Citation: ___ F.3d ___
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: May 1, 2013 | Status: PRECEDENTIAL
Type: Appeal from E.D.Tx. 07-cv-0153 (Everingham, M.J.)
Summary: AFFIRMED-in-part (jury's infringement verdict & dmgs award), VACATED-in-part (perm. inj. as overbroad), REMANDED-in-part
Judge(s): RADER (author), PROST, MOORE
Lower decision citation: n/a | n/a (0000-00-00)



Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2011-1619, -20, -35, -39 – Citation: ___ F.3d ___
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: May 1, 2013 | Status: PRECEDENTIAL
Type: Appeals from E.D.Tx. 09-cv-0097 (Ward, J.)
Summary: AFFIRMED-in-part (clm. constr. right; defs. failed to prove '149 pat. clm. 4 is obvious), REVERSED-in-part (E.D.Tx. erred in finding '463 clms. not invalid as obvious)
Judge(s): PROST (author), O'MALLEY, DYK (concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part)
Lower decision citation: n/a | n/a (0000-00-00)



Shimano, Inc. v. Rea
(the case name above is a link to the Fed.Cir. slip opinion)
Fed.Cir. Docket No(s). 2012-1286, -1294 – Citation: n/a
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH FOR ANY ORAL ARG. FILES (on Fed.Cir.'s search page)
Decided: April 29, 2013 | Status: Nonprecedential
Type: Appeal from PTO BPAI Inter Partes Reexam 95/001,051
Summary: AFFIRMED (antecedent basis clm. constr.; dep. clm. broadened in re-exam invalid for lack of written description)
Judge(s): BRYSON (author), NEWMAN, DYK
Lower decision citation: n/a | n/a (0000-00-00)